The House oversight committee has released more than 33,000 pages tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, but the bulk of the documents appear to recycle information already in the public domain. The limited disclosure, coming as Congress reconvenes, has reignited bipartisan calls for transparency. The Trump administration continues to resist releasing all remaining files, deepening suspicion that critical details are being withheld.
Read: Trump Honors Ex-Mayor Giuliani With Nation’s Highest Civilian Award Despite Criminal Charges
Thousands of Pages Released
On Tuesday, the committee made public a trove of records drawn from the Justice Department’s Epstein case files. They include years-old court filings involving Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as police bodycam footage and interviews. Despite the sheer volume, much of the material reflects evidence already accessible through prior investigations and public requests.
Also read: Texas Bans Land Sale to Foreign Buyers Under Sweeping New Law
White House Under Fire
The Trump administration has spent months under scrutiny for blocking the full release of Epstein records. Officials have urged Republican lawmakers to oppose a discharge petition by Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, which would force disclosure of all unclassified files. The move has intensified accusations that the administration is shielding damaging information.
Also read: Massachusetts Cracks Down on Junk Fees, Promises Relief for Renters
Trump’s Epstein Connection
Donald Trump, once part of Epstein’s wealthy social circle, has worked to deflect renewed scrutiny. Earlier this year, he filed a lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over its reporting on his ties to Epstein, including a birthday note he was said to have written. Trump has dismissed the controversy as a “hoax,” but questions about his past association persist.
Also read: Massive Labor Day Protests Against Troops in Chicago Shake U.S.
Lawmakers Divided Over Petition
Committee chair James Comer argued there was no need for the petition since subpoenas had already secured documents. House speaker Mike Johnson echoed that view, calling the petition “moot” and “superfluous.” Yet doubts remain about how much of the subpoenaed material will ever reach the public, leaving critics unconvinced by Republican assurances.
Also read: Chaos in Pennsylvania as Minivan Hits Child and Two Adults at Harrisburg KIPONA Festival
Survivors Meet With Congress
Johnson joined a bipartisan group of lawmakers in meeting with survivors of Epstein and Maxwell’s abuse. Their testimonies have fueled demands for complete transparency, as victims argue that partial releases only prolong public mistrust. Survivors insist a full accounting of records is vital to ensure accountability for those who enabled Epstein.
Also read: NYC Evictions Surge to Six-Year High, Leaving Thousands at Risk of Homelessness
Public Distrust Growing
A Reuters/Ipsos poll from July revealed that most Americans, including a majority of Republicans, believe the government is concealing details about the Epstein case. The administration’s refusal to release all files has even alienated some of Trump’s supporters, intensifying calls for openness. The suspicion has only grown in light of the limited disclosures.
Also read: Millions at Risk as Trump Moves to Cut HOME Housing Funds in New Budget
Democrats Slam Limited Release
Top Democratic oversight member Robert Garcia accused Republicans of staging a hollow gesture. “The 33,000 pages of Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already mostly public information. To the American people, don’t let this fool you,” he said. Garcia’s criticism underscores a widening rift in Congress over the handling of the case.