The Democratic Party launched a blistering attack on House Speaker Mike Johnson for refusing to swear in Arizona congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva, whose election victory came more than 40 days ago. Democrats allege Johnson’s delay is politically motivated, an effort to block a vote on a discharge petition seeking the release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files. The delay marks the longest gap in U.S. history between a congressional win and a swearing-in ceremony.
Historic Delay Sparks Outrage
Adelita Grijalva’s swearing-in has been stalled for 40 days, setting a new record for the longest delay between an election win and the oath of office. The Democratic Party publicly rebuked Johnson on social media, writing, “Mike Johnson: Stop protecting pedophiles, swear in Adelita Grijalva, and release the Epstein files.” The message, posted to the party’s official X account, has intensified scrutiny on the Republican leader’s motives as Democrats accuse him of undermining democratic norms.
Johnson’s Ties to Discharge Petition Debate
Critics claim Johnson’s refusal to swear in Grijalva stems from fears surrounding a discharge petition introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY). The petition, which compels a vote on releasing Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein, currently lacks just one signature — Grijalva’s. Her public support for the measure, according to Democrats, has made her seating a political risk for Johnson.
Speaker Cites Shutdown as Reason
Johnson has maintained that procedural issues, not politics, are behind the delay. He argues that the ongoing government shutdown, which began on October 1, prevents the formal swearing-in process from taking place. “We cannot proceed with official House business until the government reopens,” Johnson’s office stated earlier this month. However, Democrats and watchdog groups have dismissed that reasoning as a “stall tactic” aimed at shielding controversial information.
Epstein Survivors Add Pressure
Adding to the pressure, a group of Epstein survivors sent a letter to Johnson last week, demanding he immediately seat Grijalva. The letter, signed by several survivors, read: “Grijalva was duly elected and certified to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives. Her constituents have spoken, and their voice deserves representation without further delay.” The survivors accused Johnson of “an unacceptable breach of democratic norms and a disservice to the American people.”
Grijalva Accuses Johnson of Obstruction
Grijalva has repeatedly accused the speaker of deliberate obstruction. As early as October 6, she claimed Johnson was using procedural excuses to prevent her from taking office. “This isn’t about bureaucracy — it’s about transparency and accountability,” she told reporters. “The people of Arizona’s district have been silenced for more than a month.” Her supporters argue that the delay not only denies representation but also undermines confidence in Congress.
Democrats Unite Behind Grijalva
Leading Democrats have rallied behind Grijalva, framing the issue as a test of democratic integrity. The party’s official statement condemned Johnson’s inaction, saying it “reflects a disturbing willingness to protect the powerful at the expense of the public.” Party strategists say the controversy could energize voters heading into 2026, especially amid heightened public interest in the Epstein case and government transparency.
Mounting Political Fallout for Johnson
The controversy is adding to the growing list of challenges facing Speaker Johnson, who is already under fire for his handling of the government shutdown and internal party disputes. Critics warn that his refusal to act could deepen divisions within the GOP and tarnish the House’s credibility. With pressure mounting from both parties — and Epstein survivors publicly calling for action — Johnson’s next move could carry significant political consequences.