Trump Admin Proposes Budget Cut for Ohio’s Fair Housing Program

Trump Administration Proposes Budget Cut for Ohio's Anti-Discrimination Housing Program
Brookings Institution

Fair housing organizations throughout Ohio gathered on May 29 to discuss concerns over the White House’s budget proposal to eliminate funding for the Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP). This program plays a vital role in protecting millions from housing discrimination. Advocates warn that cutting funds would severely weaken local enforcement and support systems.

Read: Landlord Pays $685,000 to Settle Tenant Harassment in California

Budget Cuts Threaten Protections

Budget Cuts Threaten Protections
National Public Radio

The White House’s discretionary budget request proposes ending federal funding for fair housing initiatives, sparking alarm among Ohio’s fair housing advocates. The Fair Housing Initiatives Program, established in 1987 under President Ronald Reagan, has been instrumental in supporting individuals facing discrimination and enabling local organizations to enforce the Fair Housing Act. These efforts include conducting investigations, aiding complainants, facilitating conciliations, and preventing disputes from escalating.

Also read: 200-Year-Old Windmill Converted to Family Home Hits Market for £900,000

Guardians of Fair Housing

Guardians of Fair Housing
National Fair Housing Alliance/ Facebook

Darlene English, associate vice president of education and outreach at the National Fair Housing Alliance, highlighted the often unseen protections afforded to renters and mortgage applicants. “When you apply for an apartment or a mortgage loan, you may not realize that you may have been protected from housing discrimination,” she said. She emphasized that fair housing groups nationwide actively train landlords and educate mortgage lenders on their responsibilities, while also holding them accountable. Ohio’s organizations are an essential part of this network.

Also read: Tenants Fight Back After Illegal Evictions Shake Missouri

Critical Local Partnerships

Critical Local Partnerships
National Fair Housing Alliance/ Facebook

Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, depends heavily on its local FHIP agency to uphold fair housing standards. Lisa Gold-Scott, the city’s assistant director of law and assistant prosecutor, noted, “Without our local FHIP, the residents of Shaker Heights will be left with fewer resources, fewer options, and protections. It’s a partnership that has served our residents well.” The city’s collaboration with the agency has been pivotal in maintaining housing equity.

Also read: Olympia Weighs Limits on Landlord Access to Tenant Screening Data

Significant Yet Small Budget

Significant Yet Small Budget
The Blade

George Thomas, CEO and general counsel of the Fair Housing Center for Lucas and Wood Counties, pointed out the disproportionate value of the FHIP budget, “The previous FHIP budget only accounted for 0.0008% of the total federal budget.” Despite its small size, this funding has a powerful impact, especially amid ongoing housing challenges across Ohio.

Also read: Homeowner Restores 160-Year-Old Door to Original Chestnut Glow with Handwork and Patience

Leading Enforcement Role

Leading Enforcement Role
National Fair Housing Alliance/ Facebook

According to the National Fair Housing Alliance, FHIP-funded organizations process over 75% of all housing discrimination complaints, dwarfing the roughly 5% handled by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Thomas stressed, “We effectively enforce the Fair Housing laws for millions of Americans across the country, and certainly here in Ohio.” He added that these grantees save the government money by preventing discrimination-related homelessness and costly emergency interventions.

Also read: New York City Brokers Fight Law Banning Fees for Renters

No Replacement Support

No Replacement Support
National Fair Housing Alliance/ Facebook

Jim McCarthy, president and CEO of the Miami Valley Fair Housing Center, warned that if federal funding ends, Ohio lacks the infrastructure to compensate for the loss. “There’s not a system set up to provide the funding to us,” he explained. “So we need to maintain the FHIP program as is until there is a mindful and planned alternative for doing anything different.”

Next up: