Trump Takes Control of DC Police, Deploys National Guard in Crime Crackdown

In an unprecedented move, U.S. President Donald Trump has deployed 800 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., while taking direct control of the city’s police force. The action is part of his ongoing effort to combat violent crime, positioning himself as the “law and order” president. As the city grapples with rising tensions, Trump’s decision has sparked intense debate and concern over federal authority in local matters.

Read: Trump Moves Obama, Bush Portraits to Hidden Stairwell Amid Tensions

A Bold Assertion of Power

Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard and take control of Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department represents a major expansion of presidential authority. By bypassing local leadership, Trump invokes a rare clause under the Home Rule Act, citing a “public safety emergency.” His actions aim to address the city’s recent rise in violent crime, despite a noticeable decrease in violent offenses in 2024 and 2025.

Also read: Trump Moves Obama, Bush Portraits to Hidden Stairwell Amid Tensions

Trump’s Law and Order Campaign

Casting his actions as part of his broader “law and order” platform, Trump explained, “This is Liberation Day in DC, and we’re going to take our capital back.” He has long criticized local law enforcement for being too lenient, which he claims has allowed violent gangs to run rampant. The deployment of National Guard troops, which could increase if necessary, comes as a direct challenge to local officials and their ability to govern.

Also read: Archaeologists Find 300-Year-Old Pirate Shipwreck Off Madagascar’s Coast

Rising Crime in DC: A Political Issue

Although crime rates in Washington have fallen recently, the city faced a significant rise in violent crime during 2023, making it one of the nation’s deadliest cities. Trump has used these statistics to rally support for his intervention. However, local politicians, including Washington’s Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser, have disputed his claims, emphasizing that violent crime rates have dropped substantially in the past year.

Also read: Chinese Nationals Sue Texas Over Land Ownership Ban

National Guard’s Role and Deployment

The 800 National Guard troops, deployed under Trump’s orders, will carry out various duties to support local law enforcement, including logistics and physical presence in high-crime areas. Trump has also suggested that additional specialized National Guard units could be mobilized if required. Despite the federal intervention, many local citizens and critics argue that the deployment is unnecessary and merely a political show.

Also read: Texas Rep. Gene Wu Rejects Governor Abbott’s Push to Oust Him as ‘Meaningless’

Homelessness and Federal Crackdown

Trump has also focused on tackling the issue of homelessness in Washington, announcing plans to clear encampments around the city. While he has promised to provide “places to stay,” he has not outlined the specifics of where displaced individuals would go. His administration’s move to increase the federal presence has sparked concern about the treatment of homeless individuals and their rights.

Also read: Gunfight in Times Square Leaves Three Injured, Teen Arrested

Expansion to Other Cities

Trump has signaled that the strategy will extend beyond Washington, with cities like Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles possibly following. He has openly criticized these cities, which have Democratic leadership, for their handling of crime and urban decay. The federal government’s growing role in city governance may mark the beginning of broader national changes in how law enforcement is managed.

Also read: Trump Announces Swift Homeless Relocation in D.C., Likens It to ICE Raids

Legal Challenges Ahead

The decision to deploy National Guard troops has led to legal challenges. A landmark trial is underway in California regarding the use of National Guard forces in law enforcement, questioning the legality of Trump’s use of military troops in domestic matters. While the trial may have a limited impact on the current situation in Washington, it could influence future federal intervention in local affairs.

Next up: